Why God Won't Go Away
A Newberg, E D'Aquili
& V Rause, Ballantyne Books, 2001
God of the Gaps
The vast majority of humans over most of our history have believed, as
a majority probably still believes, that we can make contact with God (or
the equivalent), that the transcendent is not beyond our reach.
A few special people have experienced close contacts of a fourth kind - with
God. These are the mystics - holy people who
through hard spiritual training are given deep, profoundly satisfying and
life-changing experiences involving an obliteration of the self and a
merging with the infinite. There is
evidence that most people at one time or another, even in our
materialistic age, enter a state in which they experience a blissful sense
of unity with "the Other" or the universe or nature, call it
what you will.
Until now there has been no way of
assessing the nature of these experiences from "outside", so to
speak. As a result, God has been placed in this corner
of life, to as it were fill a gap between what can be demonstrated and what
by report happens to many people with such
profound impact that it remains a lifelong memory for them.
The "God of the gaps" has been
steadily squeezed out over past centuries. Until relatively recently in
historical terms, for example, a majority in the West thought that
epilepsy was caused by evil spirits. To drive out these devils, it was
normal and natural to call for God's intervention.
This gap once occupied by God has now been filled by human knowledge. Medical science has
established
that epilepsy is a fault in the structure and operation of the brain. Inherited genetic faults or brain damage, not demons, are its
cause. While we may pray to God to help an epileptic,
most of us would not as a result of that prayer do without medication to treat or control the
condition.
The God of the gaps has been gradually -
and sometimes suddenly - squeezed from almost every area of human
activity. This book squeezes God out of mysticism. The authors do
everything they can to preserve the God of the mystics. In my view, they
fail.
Photographing the Numinous
I'm not qualified to say if the evidence the authors present to
explain the religious and mystical experience as a brain function is
definitive. But my limited knowledge of brain function indicates that their
case is persuasive and probably conclusive. Briefly,
the authors tell how they "photograph" the brain during
meditation by their subjects. The latter are practised in prayer and
contemplation and can regularly and deliberately access a state in which they report that
the
... conscious mind quiets, allowing a deeper, simpler part ...
to emerge ... it is what remains when worries, fears, desires, and all
other preoccupations of the conscious mind are stripped away.
Buddhists
and Franciscan nuns show the same brain patterns. Those areas of the brain
which are normally intensely active in orientating us in relation to our
environment are switched off. The subjects then
...fail to find the
borderline between the self and the outside world ... [and] perceive that
the self is endless and intimately interwoven with everyone and everything
the mind senses. And this perception would feel utterly and unquestionably
real.
The Buddhists
interpret this as merging with absolute being and losing personal separateness. The
sisters "...describe the moment as a tangible sense of the closeness
of God and a mingling with Him." That is, each group interprets the
experience in terms of their own religious background, although there is
apparently no difference in the subjective experience. It's
worth reviewing at this point why the human brain is the way it is. As the
authors remind us:
The goal of every living brain ... has been to
enhance the organism's chances of survival by reacting to raw sensory data
and translating it into a negotiable rendition of the world.
The
human rendition of the world, mediated by our brains, is the most
successful the world has known. We may argue about whether or not it
reflects the world as it "really is". Be that as it may, it
works extremely well most of the time and for most people. The
brain receives data via our sensory organs. The data are
... sorted,
cross-referenced, amplified or inhibited, integrated with input from
emotional centres ... and finally assembled into a perception that has a
useful, individual meaning ...
Brain and "mind" are the
same thing seen from differing points of view - just as, for example, a
postage stamp appears very different depending upon whether one
looks at it from the front or the back. There
are those who, it seems, seek to describe the mystical in terms of
something extra-physical. They use the word "spiritual" to
indicate a human but non-physical perception or an input from God. The
spiritual in this case is not part of normal reality. This
interpretation of the human condition may be true. Perhaps we do
"have" a non-physical part of us we call our "soul".
Perhaps God does communicate with us via some hidden sense organ and using
a medium which cannot itself be perceived or measured in any known way. Maybe
there is a parallel supernatural dimension, utterly different from ours
yet able somehow to communicate with our physical universe. If
so, this book has nothing to say. It's concerned with explaining a
phenomenon which is part of the material world. As the authors remark, we have no
way of experiencing God
... except as part of a neurologically
generated rendition of reality ... There's no other way for God to get
into your head except through the brain's neural pathways.
And
again:
... every event that happens to us or any action that we take
can be associated with activity in one or more specific regions of the
brain. This includes, necessarily, all religious and spiritual
experiences.
The
Cognitive Imperative
We can now "see" ourselves meditating. The process is no
longer beyond our comprehension. We know enough now about brain functions
to work out the physiological components of attaining a blissful, detached
mental state - interpreting that state in various ways according to
personal background. Why, ask the
authors, should this capacity have developed? Our brain has developed into
what it is
through evolutionary pressures to survive. We can understand that - but
why should religious experiences be of use to us in the struggle to
survive? The authors explore the
origins of religion and religious myths, the usefulness of ritual and
mysticism. Their conclusions are necessarily speculative since hard and
extensive evidence not only isn't there but probably never will be.
Nevertheless, I found their reasoning compelling. A
cognitive imperative is proposed by the authors. This is not a "thing
in itself" but a biologically determined compulsion by which the
brain orders the world almost automatically. It is a built-in
"...need to make sense of things through the cognitive analysis of
reality." We know from psychology that the alternative to
"making sense of things" is first a mounting and eventually an
unbearable anxiety. If sensory input ceases, experiments have shown that
the brain supplies us with hallucinations. If the world ceases to make
sense, we go mad. We cannot stop ordering sensory input, even in sleep. In
short, we must make sense of life or perish. The
one thing our ancestors could make no immediate sense of is the inevitability of
suffering and death. Nor can we, of course. But extend the experience over
some millions of years during which our brain was evolving from primitive
to sophisticated form, and the perspective changes. Other questions crowd
in. Why is the world the way it is? How did it come about? Will humanity
die out one day? Is there life after death? And, most pressingly,
"How can we live in this bafflingly uncertain world and not be
afraid?" Because the cognitive
imperative requires us to cope with this continual anxiety it "...
tirelessly pushes the mind to find resolution" to questions of
existence. In the course of human history we have created ways of coping:
- We have invented myths to
"explain" the way things are.
- Rituals are found in every culture.
They help create and maintain social and religious order.
- Everyone to some degree, and mystics
to a great degree, feels that the world makes sense for them as
they enter the religious experience.

[Home] [Back] |