Radical Faith

Home

Book Reviews

Thought Map

Historical Jesus

Debate

Plain Guide

Honest Sermons

Richard Holloway

Roots

Questions

Assorted

 

Links
About this site
The Dedicated Life

FreeFind

     The Burning Bush
  Email your suggestions,
    disagreements or any
    other comments and
  they will be responded
       to without delay

No broadband?
Instead of reading pages online, open the ones you want in quick succession. Then go offline, call them up with the "History" button (Explorer] or Ctrl+H [Netscape], and read at your leisure

 
Tired of tracking back to find the page you started from? Try opening a new window by pressing SHIFT and clicking on a link. To get back just close the window.

Blessed By The Gods
by Paul Walker

It has recently been announced in Britain that every expectant mother will be able to have her child tested for Down’s Syndrome. Should the foetus be found to have the Syndrome the mother may choose to terminate the pregnancy.

No doubt some Christian groups will be horrified by this, believing that any abortion is murder. I am not a campaigner against abortion. On the contrary, I can see reasons when it might be necessary. I can fully understand why some people choose to terminate their pregnancies. And as a man I feel particularly uncomfortable about telling women what to do with their bodies.

On the issue of Down’s Syndrome, the arguments for abortion are compelling. The child has a high chance of having a heart condition. He or she will have a learning disability, will look different and may not be able to live completely independently. A mother who gives birth to such a child is likely to have responsibility for that child for far longer than a "normal" baby. Perhaps it is better all round if such a child is not born.

But, and here's the rub - my son has Down’s Syndrome.

Understandably, the sensible attitude to terminating foetuses with the condition leaves me feeling awkward.

Many questions arise. Does the attitude towards unborn children with a learning disability say something about our society’s attitude to such people? Are they less important than "normal" people? Is my son to be less valued than his two "normal" sisters?

It certainly doesn’t feel like that to me. I would be more convinced by anti-abortion Christians if they showed more care and compassion to disabled people once they are born.

Few societies can boast about their treatment of people with learning disabilities. In Britain, they were until recently institutionalised very young. In Germany, the Nazis killed them. Italians thought they had the evil eye.

Perhaps the most interesting attitude I have come across was from the Hindu doctor who spoke to me soon after our son was born. He was unaware of my profession. He told me that in his culture parents with a child like ours are considered blessed by the gods.

I was puzzled at the time. How could such a thing be a blessing? One possible answer was that having a disabled child might teach me compassion, among the most important of attributes. I’m not sure the birth of our son has made me more compassionate. But I do know that I wouldn’t change him now even if I could. Had he not been born, our family would have never experienced some of the most wonderful moments of our lives.

So the real question turns out to be, what do we consider acceptable or unacceptable in people? Squints and crooked teeth are now routinely "corrected", for example. What an interesting word "corrected" is in this context. Presumably people with straight teeth and eyes are correct, while those without are incorrect.

Perhaps we are moving towards an abnormal society in which everyone strives to be "normal". In contrast, there is something truly powerful in the Christian tradition that all people are acceptable as they are.

[Home] [Back]