A
PLAIN GUIDE TO ...
Knowing God's Will
Nestling quietly in the background of traditional
God-talk is a fundamental assumption often referred to, but seldom
questioned. It is that Christians are - or should be - committed to
carrying out God's will on this planet. But is it as simple as that? Is it
possible to know God's will at all, and if so, how?
The practice of testing people for
whether or not they know God's will is almost universal in the
Christian tradition. Searching questions are asked
at baptism, for example. "Do you renounce the devil and all his
works? Will you constantly believe God's holy Word? Will you obediently
keep his commandments? Do you promise obedience to God's holy will?"
- these reflect the kind of test usually made. Even so important a matter as becoming a Christian isn't therefore necessarily simply a
matter of conducting the right rituals. Nor is it only a matter of a
candidate's desire. Similarly
when a person claims that he or she is called to serve in an ordained
ministry, all the Church's major parties routinely accept that such a
calling must be tested. If a person persists and successfully jumps the
various hurdles erected by ecclesiastical authority, a final question is
usually asked of the candidate: "Do you think in your heart that you
are truly called according to God's will ...?" The
Church, it seems, places great emphasis on an ability to know God's will. If any teaching is universal in Christianity
it
is that everyone without exception should know and then do God's will.
Anyone proclaiming the opposite would without a doubt be regarded as on
the wrong track. In a search of Amazon.com (the
online bookshop) for "God's will" I discovered no fewer than 230
titles which one way or another addressed the subject. A search of
Google.com's 3-billion pages gave a surprisingly small response. In 2007 only
40 sites could be called up by looking for "How to do God's will."
In a small sample of library books, knowing God's
will was usually dealt with only in passing or in relation
to problems of biblical scholarship. Perhaps I've
been unfortunate in missing an existing rich vein of opinion, information and
research into methods for discovering God's will. That we should do
God's will is often asserted in Church prayers. But how to find out
what that will is, in matters both small and great, is less-often dealt
with. Nor have I found anyone wondering why God should have made it
less-than-easy to know what God's will is. Let's assume that traditional assertions are
correct, that [a] God's will is knowable and [b] we should spend time
and energy discovering it. If so, and if Church and other Christian
leaders do know God's will, it's obviously most important that
their conclusions be broadcast as quickly and as widely as possible. If
God's will on the multitude of problems which plague the world can be known, we should all be told what it is. This
is because by definition God's will is the will of that which is greater
than all that is. (Note that talking about God can be difficult.) God's
will is by definition always consistent. For example, if it's God's
will that we never use nuclear weapons whatever the situation, then it must always be wrong to use
them unless God changes his mind (to use a human metaphor). So
if you or I think we have discovered God's will with respect to nuclear
weapons, we have a duty to [1] tell others about it, and [2] let others
know how we've discovered God's will so that they can verify it for
themselves. This is not merely a facetious or
disputatious suggestion. True, it begs the question that there is a God
whose will we can know. It also assumes that God is interested enough in
our small affairs to have a will for them at all. Given that there is a
God with whom we can have some sort of personal relationship, however, it
follows that knowing God's will is all-important. God's will is by definition the right thing to do in all
circumstances. We may not always carry out God's will. But unless we know it, we
can't be blamed for doing the wrong thing - that is, for doing what's not
God's will, what traditional doctrine calls "sin". I intend for the moment to treat
"God's will" as information passed to us from God
"out there" (which applies also for God as the "ground of
our being," to use Paul Tillich's phrase). That
is, a human being is at one time unaware of God's will and at another time
aware because there has been communication between God and the human. This
is essentially the same as me not knowing what you want for breakfast
until you tell me. (You may not get what you want, but that's another
story.) As far as I've been able to discover,
there are two main traditional ways of learning God's will. [1]
We learn God's will direct, that is, at first hand. So,
for example, I have come across publicity for workshops for discovering
God's will via a direct hotline. One proposal is that God "speaks" to us
through our dreams. In an activity called "dreamwork," the
group leader claims to enable participants to
recall and interpret dreams effectively. Through their dreams they can know what
God is saying to them and thus what God wants them to do. They can
discover God's will for them. Very
similar in my view are the many books, workshops, quiet days and retreats
aimed at prayer and meditation. They usually claim to present activities which
will enable us to improve our perceptions of, and relationship with, God
(to use metaphors for "knowing" the unknowable). Many also claim
that prayer and meditation are, in addition, an effective mechanism for
knowing God's will. If these claims for prayer and
meditation have substance, it seems to me that practitioners know God's
will through two main devices:
[i] The strengthening and focusing of human
consciousness through meditation and prayer somehow allows an individual
to become aware of God's will at a level not usually accessed or not
otherwise accessible. The information we need in order to know God's
will may therefore reside normally in all of us, waiting only for
us to learn how to get to it, to dig deep enough (to use a metaphor) and
discover it. [ii] The practice of prayer - and
perhaps certain methods of prayer, if some manuals are to be believed -
may enable us to somehow "tune in" (to use another metaphor)
on information about God's will which he is constantly broadcasting, as
it were, on all frequencies. We're normally plagued by static and other interference. As a result we can't hear what God is
saying over the spiritual airwaves.
Once in the right frame of mind or
in the right place and doing the right things, however, our usual
deafness is relieved and we can hear God's voice, not literally (though
this reportedly happens sometimes) but in a manner of speaking. I'm here
as deliberately as vague about the mode of communication as those who
write and speak about it appear to be.
I have not come across anyone who claims to be able to demonstrate the physical mechanisms for either of these
ways of knowing God's will. If we suppose that in
prayer and meditation we're, as it were, digging deep to discover what's
there already, it seems that no present theory about how the human brain
works will suffice to explain how God communicates with us. We don't know
if God-information is preserved in the brain in the same way that memories
are retained (and more often not retained), for example. Can one
sub-consciously know God's will at one time and have forgotten it at
another? In essence, this possibility merely
pushes any explanation back one step. We still have to ask how the
information about God's will got into the brain in the first place. Is it
there as part of our genetic coding? Or does God implant it when we're
born. Or it is downloaded by God (to use yet another metaphor) when we
need it and not otherwise? In a sense the digging
metaphor isn't useful. The underlying question is how God communicates
with us. How do we know what God's will is? Does God speak to us using the
airwaves, as with ordinary speech? Or does God use some other method? Or
is his way of communicating with us mysterious and there's no point in
asking about it? If
God intervenes in the physical processes of the universe, then there is
every reason to expect and hope that God can excite or stimulate our
neural processes to communicate with us. If God doesn't intervene in the
physical universe then, of course, a probable conclusion is that we can
know God's will only by some other means than God-to-person communication. [2]
The second traditional means of knowing God's will is by consulting
another person or group, or by observing and interpreting some physical
omen. Some sites of the Internet, for example,
claim to have information about what God is saying to us through an
activity called "prophecy". As far as I can tell, this
information is received from God by individuals who have some sort of
ecstatic experience. Presumably the experience is both mental and
emotional in its dimensions. At any rate, normal modes of communication
are apparently superceded and the individual somehow hears or knows what God is
saying to us. Others claim to be able to "read" or interpret an
individual's situation on the basis of an account given either verbally or
in writing. From there it's apparently but a short step to being able to
explain what God's will is in the given situation. It seems that such
"spiritual counsellors" are able somehow to know God's will -
though I've yet to come across a coherent account of how exactly that
works. A more venerable version of the modern
Internet comes in the form of consulting a Church authority. (I am
reminded of the Greek Oracle of Delphi.) This
source of information about God's will can be the Roman
Catholic Pope, or a bishop, or an ordained person. Such authorities seem
to often depend on a
host of other sources for their information - the Bible, official
meetings such as synods or Councils, or tradition - rather than on direct
access to God. I have also
come across a number of versions of authority as a source of God's will in the
form of consulting or praying to a holy person such as St Francis or Saint Therese of Lisieux. But the most
frequently quoted source of information about God's will is undoubtedly
the Bible. It is supposed to contain information which comes from God
through those who wrote its various parts. Quite often this information is
thought to be infallible, in the sense that it's literally true. If
literally true, the Bible presumably therefore presents an absolute
version of God's will. But more often the information apparently needs to
be interpreted for ordinary people either by a Church authority, specialist
scholars, preachers, or someone who claims the ability to do interpretation. There are no doubt many
variations of the above supposed sources of information about God's will.
One would be, for example, the sermons preached to tens of thousands of
congregations every week. Few preachers would, I think, not assert
that
in some sense they aim to put across to their hearers an aspect of God's will. While
I think the division of knowing God's will into two sources - one direct
and the other through someone else - is a fair one to make, I should point
out that the latter is essentially the same as the former. That is, someone has discovered
God's will and then communicated it by some means to other people. The
Bible authors, the Internet, and the Pope must all have had some
communication from God in the first place to be able to tell us about
God's will.  [Home]
[Back] |