| The Absoluteness of the
Church
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith
Declaration: "Dominus Iesus"
On the Unicity and Salvific Universality
of Jesus Christ and the Church
Introduction
1. The Lord Jesus, before ascending into heaven, commanded his
disciples to proclaim the Gospel to the whole world and to baptize all
nations: "Go into the whole world and proclaim the Gospel to every
creature. He who believes and is baptized will be saved; he who does not
believe will be condemned" (Mk 16:15-16); "All power in heaven
and on earth has been given to me. Go therefore and teach all nations,
baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy
Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. And
behold, I am with you always, until the end of the world" (Mt
28:18-20; cf. Lk 24:46-48; Jn 17:18,20,21; Acts 1:8).
The Church's universal mission is born from the command of Jesus Christ
and is fulfilled in the course of the centuries in the proclamation of the
mystery of God, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, and the mystery of the
incarnation of the Son, as saving event for all humanity. The fundamental
contents of the profession of the Christian faith are expressed thus:
"I believe in one God, the Father, Almighty, maker of heaven and
earth, of all that is, seen and unseen. I believe in one Lord, Jesus
Christ, the only Son of God, eternally begotten of the Father, God from
God, Light from Light, true God from true God, begotten, not made, of one
being with the Father. Through him all things were made. For us men and
for our salvation, he came down from heaven: by the power of the Holy
Spirit he became incarnate of the Virgin Mary, and became man. For our
sake he was crucified under Pontius Pilate; he suffered death and was
buried. On the third day he rose again in accordance with the Scriptures;
he ascended into heaven and is seated at the right hand of the Father. He
will come again in glory to judge the living and the dead, and his kingdom
will have no end. I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of
life, who proceeds from the Father. With the Father and the Son he is
worshipped and glorified. He has spoken through the prophets. I believe in
one holy catholic and apostolic Church. I acknowledge one baptism for the
forgiveness of sins. I look for the resurrection of the dead, and the life
of the world to come". [1]
2. In the course of the centuries, the Church has proclaimed and
witnessed with fidelity to the Gospel of Jesus. At the close of the second
millennium, however, this mission is still far from complete.[2] For that
reason, Saint Paul's words are now more relevant than ever:
"Preaching the Gospel is not a reason for me to boast; it is a
necessity laid on me: woe to me if I do not preach the Gospel!" (1
Cor 9:16). This explains the Magisterium's particular attention to giving
reasons for and supporting the evangelizing mission of the Church, above
all in connection with the religious traditions of the world. [3]
In considering the values which these religions witness to and offer
humanity, with an open and positive approach, the Second Vatican Council's
Declaration on the relation of the Church to non-Christian religions
states: "The Catholic Church rejects nothing of what is true and holy
in these religions. She has a high regard for the manner of life and
conduct, the precepts and teachings, which, although differing in many
ways from her own teaching, nonetheless often reflect a ray of that truth
which enlightens all men". [4] Continuing in this line of thought,
the Church's proclamation of Jesus Christ, "the way, the truth, and
the life" (Jn 14:6), today also makes use of the practice of
inter-religious dialogue. Such dialogue certainly does not replace, but
rather accompanies the missio ad gentes, directed toward that
"mystery of unity", from which "it follows that all men and
women who are saved share, though differently, in the same mystery of
salvation in Jesus Christ through his Spirit". [5] Inter-religious
dialogue, which is part of the Church's evangelizing mission, [6] requires
an attitude of understanding and a relationship of mutual knowledge and
reciprocal enrichment, in obedience to the truth and with respect for
freedom. [7]
3. In the practice of dialogue between the Christian faith and other
religious traditions, as well as in seeking to understand its theoretical
basis more deeply, new questions arise that need to be addressed through
pursuing new paths of research, advancing proposals, and suggesting ways
of acting that call for attentive discernment. In this task, the present
Declaration seeks to recall to Bishops, theologians, and all the Catholic
faithful, certain indispensable elements of
Christian doctrine, which may help theological reflection in developing
solutions consistent with the contents of the faith and responsive to the
pressing needs of contemporary culture.
The expository language of the Declaration corresponds to its purpose,
which is not to treat in a systematic manner the question of the unicity
and salvific universality of the mystery of Jesus Christ and the Church,
nor to propose solutions to questions that are matters of free theological
debate, but rather to set forth again the doctrine of the Catholic faith
in these areas, pointing out some fundamental questions that remain open
to further development, and refuting specific positions that are erroneous
or ambiguous. For this reason, the Declaration takes up what has been
taught in previous Magisterial documents, in order to reiterate certain
truths that are part of the Church's faith.
4. The Church's constant missionary proclamation is endangered today by
relativistic theories which seek to justify religious pluralism, not only de
facto but also de iure (or in principle). As a consequence, it
is held that certain truths have been superseded; for example, the definitive
and complete character of the revelation of Jesus Christ, the
nature of Christian faith as compared with that of belief in other
religions, the inspired nature of the books of Sacred Scripture, the
personal unity between the Eternal Word and Jesus of Nazareth, the unity
of the economy of the Incarnate Word and the Holy Spirit, the unicity and
salvific universality of the mystery of Jesus Christ, the universal
salvific mediation of the Church, the inseparability — while recognizing
the distinction — of the kingdom of God, the kingdom of Christ, and the
Church, and the subsistence of the one Church of Christ in the Catholic
Church.
The roots of these problems are to be found in certain presuppositions
of both a philosophical and theological nature, which hinder the
understanding and acceptance of the revealed truth.
Some of these can be mentioned:
- the conviction of the elusiveness and inexpressibility of divine
truth, even by Christian revelation;
- relativistic attitudes toward truth itself, according to which what
is true for some would not be true for others;
- the radical opposition posited between the logical mentality of the
West and the symbolic mentality of the East;
- the subjectivism which, by regarding reason as the only source of
knowledge, becomes incapable of raising its "gaze to the heights,
not daring to rise to the truth of being"; [8]
- the difficulty in understanding and accepting the presence of
definitive and eschatological events in history;
- the metaphysical emptying of the historical incarnation of the
Eternal Logos, reduced to a mere appearing of God in history;
- the eclecticism of those who, in theological research, uncritically
absorb ideas from a variety of philosophical and theological contexts
without regard for consistency, systematic connection, or
compatibility with Christian truth;
- finally, the tendency to read and to interpret Sacred Scripture
outside the Tradition and Magisterium of the Church.
On the basis of such presuppositions, which may evince different
nuances, certain theological proposals are developed — at times
presented as assertions, and at times as hypotheses — in which Christian
revelation and the mystery of Jesus Christ and the Church lose their
character of absolute truth and salvific universality, or at least shadows
of doubt and uncertainty are cast upon them.
The Fullness and Definitiveness of the Revelation of Jesus Christ
5. As a remedy for this relativistic mentality, which is becoming ever
more common, it is necessary above all to reassert the definitive
and complete character of the revelation of Jesus Christ. In fact,
it must be firmly believed that, in the mystery of Jesus Christ, the
Incarnate Son of God, who is "the way, the truth, and the life"
(Jn 14:6), the full revelation of divine truth is given: "No one
knows the Son except the Father, and no one knows the Father except the
Son and anyone to whom the Son wishes to reveal him" (Mt 11:27);
"No one has ever seen God; God the only Son, who is in the bosom of
the Father, has revealed him" (Jn 1:18); "For in Christ the
whole fullness of divinity dwells in bodily form" (Col 2:9-10).
Faithful to God's word, the Second Vatican Council teaches: "By
this revelation then, the deepest truth about God and the salvation of man
shines forth in Christ, who is at the same time the mediator and the
fullness of all revelation". [9] Furthermore, "Jesus Christ,
therefore, the Word made flesh, sent ‘as a man to men', ‘speaks the
words of God' (Jn 3:34), and completes the work of salvation which his
Father gave him to do (cf. Jn 5:36; 17:4). To see Jesus is to see his
Father (cf. Jn 14:9). For this reason, Jesus perfected revelation by
fulfilling it through his whole work of making himself present and
manifesting himself: through his words and deeds, his signs and wonders,
but especially through his death and glorious resurrection from the dead
and finally with the sending of the Spirit of truth, he completed and
perfected revelation and confirmed it with divine testimony... The
Christian dispensation, therefore, as the new and definitive covenant,
will never pass away, and we now await no further new public revelation
before the glorious manifestation of our Lord Jesus Christ (cf. 1
Tim 6:14 and Tit 2:13)". [10]
Thus, the Encyclical Redemptoris Missio calls the Church once
again to the task of announcing the Gospel as the fullness of truth:
"In this definitive Word of his revelation, God has made himself
known in the fullest possible way. He has revealed to mankind who he is.
This definitive self-revelation of God is the fundamental reason why the
Church is missionary by her very nature. She cannot do other than proclaim
the Gospel, that is, the fullness of the truth which God has
enabled us to know about himself". [11] Only the revelation of Jesus
Christ, therefore, "introduces into our history a universal and
ultimate truth which stirs the human mind to ceaseless effort". [12]
6. Therefore, the theory of the limited, incomplete, or imperfect
character of the revelation of Jesus Christ, which would be complementary
to that found in other religions, is contrary to the Church's faith. Such
a position would claim to be based on the notion that the
truth about God cannot be grasped and manifested in its globality and
completeness by any historical religion, neither by Christianity nor by
Jesus Christ.
Such a position is in radical contradiction with the foregoing
statements of Catholic faith according to which the full and complete
revelation of the salvific mystery of God is given in Jesus Christ.
Therefore, the words, deeds, and entire historical event of Jesus, though
limited as human realities, have nevertheless the divine Person of the
Incarnate Word, "true God and true man" [13] as their subject.
For this reason, they possess in themselves the definitiveness and
completeness of the revelation of God's salvific ways, even if the depth
of the divine mystery in itself remains transcendent and inexhaustible.
The truth about God is not abolished or reduced because it is spoken in
human language; rather, it is unique, full, and complete, because
he who speaks and acts is the Incarnate Son of God. Thus, faith
requires us to profess that the Word made flesh, in his entire mystery,
who moves from incarnation to glorification, is the source, participated
but real, as well as the fulfilment of every salvific revelation of God to
humanity, [14] and that the Holy Spirit, who is Christ's Spirit, will
teach this "entire truth" (Jn 16:13) to the Apostles and,
through them, to the whole Church.
7. The proper response to God's revelation is "the obedience of
faith (Rom 16:26; cf. Rom 1:5; 2 Cor 10:5-6) by which man freely entrusts
his entire self to God, offering ‘the full
submission of intellect and will to God who reveals' and freely
assenting to the revelation given by him". [15] Faith is a gift of
grace: "in order to have faith, the grace of God must come first and
give assistance; there must also be the interior helps of the Holy Spirit,
who moves the heart and converts it to God, who opens the eyes of the mind
and gives ‘to everyone joy and ease in assenting to and believing in the
truth'". [16]
The obedience of faith implies acceptance of the truth of
Christ's revelation, guaranteed by God, who is Truth itself: [17]
"Faith is first of all a personal adherence of man to God. At the
same time, and inseparably, it is a free assent to
the whole truth that God has revealed". [18] Faith, therefore,
as "a gift of God" and as "a supernatural virtue infused by
him", [19] involves a dual adherence: to God who reveals and to the
truth which he reveals, out of the trust which one has in him who speaks.
Thus, "we must believe in no one but God: the Father, the Son and the
Holy Spirit". [20]
For this reason, the distinction between theological faith and belief
in the other religions, must be firmly held. If faith is the acceptance in
grace of revealed truth, which "makes it possible to penetrate the
mystery in a way that allows us to understand it coherently", [21]
then belief, in the other religions, is that sum of experience and thought
that constitutes the human treasury of wisdom and religious aspiration,
which man in his search for truth has conceived and acted upon in his
relationship to God and the Absolute. [22]
This distinction is not always borne in mind in current theological
reflection. Thus, theological faith (the acceptance of the truth revealed
by the One and Triune God) is often identified with belief in other
religions, which is religious experience still in
search of the absolute truth and still lacking assent to God who
reveals himself. This is one of the reasons why the differences between
Christianity and the other religions tend to be reduced at times to the
point of disappearance.
8. The hypothesis of the inspired value of the sacred writings of other
religions is also put forward. Certainly, it must be recognized that there
are some elements in these texts which may be de facto instruments
by which countless people throughout the centuries have been and still are
able today to nourish and maintain their life-relationship with God. Thus,
as noted above, the Second Vatican Council, in considering the customs,
precepts, and teachings of the other religions, teaches that
"although differing in many ways from her own teaching, these
nevertheless often reflect a ray of that truth which enlightens all
men". [23]
The Church's tradition, however, reserves the designation of inspired
texts to the canonical books of the Old and New Testaments, since these
are inspired by the Holy Spirit. [24] Taking
up this tradition, the Dogmatic Constitution on Divine Revelation of the
Second Vatican Council states: "For Holy Mother Church, relying on
the faith of the apostolic age, accepts as sacred and canonical the books
of the Old and New Testaments, whole and entire, with all their parts, on
the grounds that, written under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit (cf. Jn
20:31; 2 Tim 3:16; 2 Pet 1:19-21; 3:15-16), they have God
as their author, and have been handed on as such to the Church
herself". [25] These books "firmly, faithfully, and without
error, teach that truth which God, for the sake of our salvation,
wished to see confided to the Sacred Scriptures".26
Nevertheless, God, who desires to call all peoples to himself in Christ
and to communicate to them the fullness of his revelation and love,
"does not fail to make himself present in many ways, not only to
individuals, but also to entire peoples through their spiritual riches, of
which their religions are the main and essential expression even when they
contain ‘gaps, insufficiencies and errors'". [27] Therefore, the
sacred books of other religions, which in actual fact direct and nourish
the existence of their followers, receive from the mystery of Christ the
elements of goodness and grace which they contain.
The Incarnate Logos and the Holy Spirit in the Work of Salvation
9. In contemporary theological reflection there often emerges an
approach to Jesus of Nazareth that considers him a
particular, finite, historical figure, who reveals the divine not
in an exclusive way, but in a way complementary with other revelatory and
salvific figures. The Infinite, the Absolute, the Ultimate Mystery of God
would thus manifest itself to humanity in many ways and in many historical
figures: Jesus of Nazareth would be one of these. More concretely, for
some, Jesus would be one of the many faces
which the Logos has assumed in the course of time to communicate with
humanity in a salvific way.
Furthermore, to justify the universality of Christian salvation as well
as the fact of religious pluralism, it has been proposed that there is an
economy of the eternal Word that is valid also outside the Church and is
unrelated to her, in addition to an economy of the incarnate Word. The
first would have a greater universal value than the second, which is
limited to Christians, though God's presence would be more full in the
second.
10. These theses are in profound conflict with
the Christian faith. The doctrine of faith must be firmly believed
which proclaims that Jesus of Nazareth, son of Mary, and he alone, is the
Son and the Word of the Father. The Word, which "was in the beginning
with God" (Jn 1:2) is the same as he who "became flesh" (Jn
1:14). In Jesus, "the Christ, the Son of the living God" (Mt
16:16), "the whole fullness of divinity dwells in bodily form"
(Col 2:9). He is the "only begotten Son of the Father, who is in the
bosom of the Father" (Jn 1:18), his "beloved Son, in whom we
have redemption... In him the fullness of God was pleased to dwell, and
through him, God was pleased to reconcile all things to himself, on earth
and in the heavens, making peace by the blood of his Cross" (Col
1:13-14; 19-20).
Faithful to Sacred Scripture and refuting erroneous and reductive
interpretations, the First Council of Nicaea solemnly defined its faith
in: "Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the only begotten generated from
the Father, that is, from the being of the Father, God from God, Light
from Light, true God from true God, begotten, not made, one in being with
the Father, through whom all things were made, those in heaven and those
on earth. For us men and for our salvation, he came down and became
incarnate, was made man, suffered, and rose again on the third day. He
ascended to the heavens and shall come again to judge the living and the
dead". [28] Following the teachings of the Fathers of the Church, the
Council of Chalcedon also professed: "the one and the same Son, our
Lord Jesus Christ, the same perfect in divinity and perfect in humanity,
the same truly God and truly man..., one in being with the Father
according to the divinity and one in being with us according to the
humanity..., begotten of the Father before the ages according to the
divinity and, in these last days, for us and our salvation, of Mary, the
Virgin Mother of God, according to the humanity". [29]
For this reason, the Second Vatican Council states that Christ
"the new Adam...‘image of the invisible God' (Col 1:15) is himself
the perfect man who has restored that likeness to God in the children of
Adam which had been disfigured since the first sin... As an innocent lamb
he merited life for us by his blood which he freely shed. In him God
reconciled us to himself and to one another, freeing us from the bondage
of the devil and of sin, so that each one of us could say with the
apostle: the Son of God ‘loved me and gave himself up for me' (Gal
2:20)". [30]
In this regard, John Paul II has explicitly
declared: "To introduce any sort of separation between the
Word and Jesus Christ is contrary to the Christian faith... Jesus is the
Incarnate Word — a single and indivisible person... Christ is none other
than Jesus of Nazareth; he is the Word of God made man for the salvation
of all... In the process of discovering and appreciating the manifold
gifts — especially the spiritual treasures — that God has bestowed on
every people, we cannot separate those gifts from Jesus Christ, who is at
the centre of God's plan of salvation". [31]
It is likewise contrary to the Catholic faith to introduce a separation
between the salvific action of the Word as such and that of the Word made
man. With the incarnation, all the salvific actions of the Word of God are
always done in unity with the human nature that he has assumed for the
salvation of all people. The one subject which operates in the two
natures, human and divine, is the single person of the Word.[32]
Therefore, the theory which would attribute, after the incarnation as
well, a salvific activity to the Logos as such in his divinity, exercised
"in addition to" or "beyond" the humanity of Christ,
is not compatible with the Catholic faith. [33]
11. Similarly, the doctrine of faith regarding the unicity of the
salvific economy willed by the One and Triune God must be firmly believed,
at the source and centre of which is the mystery of the incarnation of the
Word, mediator of divine grace on the level of creation and redemption
(cf. Col 1:15-20), he who recapitulates all things (cf. Eph 1:10), he
"whom God has made our wisdom, our righteousness, and sanctification
and redemption" (1 Cor 1:30). In fact, the mystery of Christ has its
own intrinsic unity, which extends from the eternal choice in God to the parousia:
"he [the Father] chose us in Christ before the foundation of the
world to be holy and blameless before him in love" (Eph 1:4);
"In Christ we are heirs, having been destined according to the
purpose of him who accomplishes all things according to his counsel and
will" (Eph 1:11); "For those whom he foreknew he also
predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, in order that he
might be the firstborn among many brothers; those whom he predestined he
also called; and those whom he called he also justified; and those whom he
justified he also glorified" (Rom 8:29-30).
The Church's Magisterium, faithful to divine revelation, reasserts that
Jesus Christ is the mediator and the universal redeemer: "The Word of
God, through whom all things were made, was made flesh, so that as perfect
man he could save all men and sum up all things in himself. The Lord...is
he whom the Father raised from the dead, exalted and placed at his right
hand, constituting him judge of the living and the dead". [34] This
salvific mediation implies also the unicity of the redemptive sacrifice of
Christ, eternal high priest (cf. Heb 6:20; 9:11; 10:12-14).
12. There are also those who propose the hypothesis of an economy of
the Holy Spirit with a more universal breadth than that of the Incarnate
Word, crucified and risen. This position also is contrary to the Catholic
faith, which, on the contrary, considers the salvific incarnation of the
Word as a Trinitarian event. In the New Testament, the mystery of Jesus,
the Incarnate Word, constitutes the place of the Holy Spirit's presence as
well as the principle of the Spirit's effusion on humanity, not only in
messianic times (cf. Acts 2:32-36; Jn 7:39, 20:22; 1 Cor 15:45), but also
prior to his coming in history (cf. 1 Cor 10:4; 1 Pet 1:10-12).
The Second Vatican Council has recalled to the consciousness of the
Church's faith this fundamental truth. In presenting the Father's salvific
plan for all humanity, the Council closely links the mystery of Christ
from its very beginnings with that of the Spirit. [35] The entire work of
building the Church by Jesus Christ the Head, in the course of the
centuries, is seen as an action which he does in communion with his
Spirit. [36]
Furthermore, the salvific action of Jesus Christ, with and through his
Spirit, extends beyond the visible boundaries of the
Church to all humanity. Speaking of the paschal mystery, in which
Christ even now associates the believer to himself in a living manner in
the Spirit and gives him the hope of resurrection, the Council states:
"All this holds true not only for Christians but also for all men of
good will in whose hearts grace is active invisibly. For since Christ died
for all, and since all men are in fact called to one and the same destiny,
which is divine, we must hold that the Holy Spirit offers to all the
possibility of being made partners, in a way known to God, in the paschal
mystery". [37]
Hence, the connection is clear between the salvific mystery of the
Incarnate Word and that of the Spirit, who actualises the salvific
efficacy of the Son made man in the lives of all people, called by God to
a single goal, both those who historically preceded the Word made man, and
those who live after his coming in history: the Spirit of the Father,
bestowed abundantly by the Son, is the animator of all (cf. Jn 3:34).
Thus, the recent Magisterium of the Church has firmly and clearly
recalled the truth of a single divine economy: "The Spirit's presence
and activity affect not only individuals but also society and history,
peoples, cultures and religions... The Risen Christ ‘is now at work in
human hearts through the strength of his Spirit'... Again, it is the
Spirit who sows the ‘seeds of the word' present in various customs and
cultures, preparing them for full maturity in
Christ". [38] While recognizing the historical-salvific function of
the Spirit in the whole universe and in the entire history of humanity,
[39] the Magisterium states: "This is the same Spirit who was at work
in the incarnation and in the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus and
who is at work in the Church. He is therefore not an alternative to Christ
nor does he fill a sort of void which is sometimes suggested as existing
between Christ and the Logos. Whatever the Spirit brings about in human
hearts and in the history of peoples, in cultures and religions, serves as
a preparation for the Gospel and can only be understood in reference to
Christ, the Word who took flesh by the power of the Spirit ‘so that as
perfectly human he would save all human beings and sum up all
things'". [40]
In conclusion, the action of the Spirit is not outside or parallel to
the action of Christ. There is only one salvific economy of the One and
Triune God, realized in the mystery of the incarnation, death, and
resurrection of the Son of God, actualised with the co-operation of the
Holy Spirit, and extended in its salvific value to all humanity and to the
entire universe: "No one, therefore, can enter into communion with
God except through Christ, by the working of the Holy Spirit". [41]
Unicity and Universality of the Salvific Mystery of Jesus Christ
13. The thesis which denies the unicity and salvific universality of
the mystery of Jesus Christ is also put forward. Such a position has no
biblical foundation. In fact, the truth of Jesus Christ, Son of God, Lord
and only Saviour, who through the event of his incarnation, death and
resurrection has brought the history of salvation to fulfilment, and which
has in him its fullness and centre, must be firmly
believed as a constant element of the Church's faith.
The New Testament attests to this fact with clarity: "The Father
has sent his Son as the Saviour of the world" (1 Jn 4:14);
"Behold the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world" (Jn
1:29). In his discourse before the Sanhedrin, Peter, in order to justify
the healing of a man who was crippled from birth, which was done in the
name of Jesus (cf. Acts 3:1-8), proclaims: "There is salvation in no
one else, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which
we must be saved" (Acts 4:12). St. Paul adds, moreover, that Jesus
Christ "is Lord of all", "judge of the living and the
dead", and thus "whoever believes in him receives forgiveness of
sins through his name" (Acts 10: 36,42,43).
Paul, addressing himself to the community of Corinth, writes:
"Indeed, even though there may be so-called gods in heaven or on
earth — as in fact there are many gods and many lords — yet for us
there is one God, the Father, from whom are all things and for whom we
exist, and one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom are all things and through
whom we exist" (1 Cor 8:5-6). Furthermore, John the Apostle states:
"For God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, so that
everyone who believes in him may not perish but may have eternal life. God
did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order
that the world might be saved through him" (Jn 3:16-17). In the New
Testament, the universal salvific will of God is closely connected to the
sole mediation of Christ: "[God] desires all men to be saved and to
come to the knowledge of the truth. For there is one God; there is also
one mediator between God and men, the man Jesus Christ, who gave himself
as a ransom for all" (1 Tim 2:4-6).
It was in the awareness of the one universal gift of salvation offered
by the Father through Jesus Christ in the Spirit (cf. Eph 1:3-14), that
the first Christians encountered the Jewish people, showing them the
fulfilment of salvation that went beyond the Law and, in the same
awareness, they confronted the pagan world of their time, which aspired to
salvation through a plurality of saviours. This inheritance of faith has
been recalled recently by the Church's Magisterium: "The Church
believes that Christ, who died and was raised for the sake of all (cf. 2
Cor 5:15) can, through his Spirit, give man the light and the strength to
be able to respond to his highest calling, nor is there any other name
under heaven given among men by which they can be saved (cf. Acts 4:12).
The Church likewise believes that the key, the centre, and the purpose of
the whole of man's history is to be found in its Lord and Master".
[42]
14. It must therefore be firmly believed as a truth of Catholic faith
that the universal salvific will of the One and Triune God is offered and
accomplished once for all in the mystery of the incarnation, death, and
resurrection of the Son of God.
Bearing in mind this article of faith, theology today, in its
reflection on the existence of other religious experiences and on their
meaning in God's salvific plan, is invited to explore if and in what way
the historical figures and positive elements of these religions may fall
within the divine plan of salvation. In this
undertaking, theological research has a vast field of work under the
guidance of the Church's Magisterium. The Second Vatican Council, in fact,
has stated that: "the unique mediation of the Redeemer does not
exclude, but rather gives rise to a manifold co-operation which is but a
participation in this one source". [43] The content of this
participated mediation should be explored more deeply, but must remain
always consistent with the principle of Christ's unique mediation:
"Although participated forms of mediation of different kinds and
degrees are not excluded, they acquire meaning and
value only from Christ's own mediation, and they cannot be
understood as parallel or complementary to his". [44] Hence, those
solutions that propose a salvific action of God beyond the unique
mediation of Christ would be contrary to Christian and Catholic faith.
15. Not infrequently it is proposed that theology should avoid the use
of terms like "unicity", "universality", and
"absoluteness", which give the impression of excessive emphasis
on the significance and value of the salvific event of Jesus Christ in
relation to other religions. In reality, however,
such language is simply being faithful to revelation, since it represents
a development of the sources of the faith themselves. From the
beginning, the community of believers has recognized in Jesus a salvific
value such that he alone, as Son of God made man, crucified and risen, by
the mission received from the Father and in the power of the Holy Spirit,
bestows revelation (cf. Mt 11:27) and divine life (cf. Jn 1:12; 5:25-26;
17:2) to all humanity and to every person.
In this sense, one can and must say that Jesus Christ has a
significance and a value for the human race and its
history, which are unique and singular, proper to him alone, exclusive,
universal, and absolute. Jesus is, in fact, the Word of God made
man for the salvation of all. In expressing this consciousness of faith,
the Second Vatican Council teaches: "The Word of God, through whom
all things were made, was made flesh, so that as perfect man he could save
all men and sum up all things in himself. The Lord is the goal of human
history, the focal point of the desires of history and civilization, the
centre of mankind, the joy of all hearts, and the fulfilment of all
aspirations. It is he whom the Father raised from the dead, exalted and
placed at his right hand, constituting him judge of the living and the
dead".45 "It is precisely this uniqueness of Christ which gives
him an absolute and universal significance whereby, while belonging to
history, he remains history's centre and goal: ‘I am the Alpha and the
Omega, the first and the last, the beginning and the end' (Rev
22:13)". [46]
The Unicity and Unity of the Church
16. The Lord Jesus, the only Saviour, did not
only establish a simple community of disciples, but constituted the Church
as a salvific mystery: he himself is in the Church and the Church is in
him (cf. Jn 15:1ff.; Gal 3:28; Eph 4:15-16; Acts 9:5). Therefore, the
fullness of Christ's salvific mystery belongs also
to the Church, inseparably united to her Lord. Indeed, Jesus Christ
continues his presence and his work of salvation in the Church and by
means of the Church (cf. Col 1:24-27),47 which is his body (cf. 1 Cor
12:12-13, 27; Col 1:18).48 And thus, just as the head and members of a
living body, though not identical, are inseparable, so too Christ
and the Church can neither be confused nor separated, and constitute a
single "whole Christ".49 This same inseparability is also
expressed in the New Testament by the analogy of the Church as the Bride
of Christ (cf. 2 Cor 11:2; Eph 5:25-29; Rev 21:2,9).[50]
Therefore, in connection with the unicity and universality of the
salvific mediation of Jesus Christ, the unicity of
the Church founded by him must be firmly believed as a truth of
Catholic faith. Just as there is one Christ, so there exists a single body
of Christ, a single Bride of Christ: "a single Catholic and apostolic
Church". [51] Furthermore, the promises of the Lord that he would not
abandon his Church (cf. Mt 16:18; 28:20) and that he would guide her by
his Spirit (cf. Jn 16:13) mean, according to Catholic faith, that the
unicity and the unity of the Church — like everything that belongs to
the Church's integrity — will never be lacking. [52]
The Catholic faithful are required to profess
that there is an historical continuity — rooted in the apostolic
succession [53] — between the Church founded by Christ and the
Catholic Church: "This is the single Church of Christ... which our
Saviour, after his resurrection, entrusted to Peter's pastoral care (cf.
Jn 21:17), commissioning him and the other Apostles to extend and rule her
(cf. Mt 28:18ff.), erected for all ages as ‘the
pillar and mainstay of the truth' (1 Tim 3:15). This Church,
constituted and organized as a society in the present world, subsists in [subsistit
in] the Catholic Church, governed by the
Successor of Peter and by the Bishops in communion with him".
[54] With the expression subsistit in, the Second Vatican Council
sought to harmonise two doctrinal statements: on the one hand, that the
Church of Christ, despite the divisions which exist among Christians,
continues to exist fully only in the Catholic Church, and on the other
hand, that "outside of her structure, many elements can be found of
sanctification and truth", [55] that is, in those Churches and
ecclesial communities which are not yet in full communion with the
Catholic Church. [56] But with respect to these, it needs to be stated
that "they derive their efficacy from the very fullness of grace and
truth entrusted to the Catholic Church". [57]
17. Therefore, there exists a single Church of
Christ, which subsists in the Catholic Church, governed by the Successor
of Peter and by the Bishops in communion with him. [58] The
Churches which, while not existing in perfect communion with the Catholic
Church, remain united to her by means of the closest bonds, that is, by
apostolic succession and a valid Eucharist, are true particular Churches.
[59] Therefore, the Church of Christ is present and operative also in
these Churches, even though they lack full communion with the Catholic
Church, since they do not accept the Catholic doctrine of the Primacy,
which, according to the will of God, the Bishop of
Rome objectively has and exercises over the entire Church. [60]
On the other hand, the ecclesial communities which have not preserved
the valid Episcopate and the genuine and integral substance of the
Eucharistic mystery, [61] are not Churches in the proper sense; however,
those who are baptized in these communities are, by Baptism, incorporated
in Christ and thus are in a certain communion, albeit imperfect, with the
Church. [62] Baptism in fact tends per se toward the full
development of life in Christ, through the integral profession of faith,
the Eucharist, and full communion in the Church. [63]
"The Christian faithful are therefore not permitted to imagine
that the Church of Christ is nothing more than a collection — divided,
yet in some way one — of Churches and ecclesial communities; nor are
they free to hold that today the Church of Christ nowhere really exists,
and must be considered only as a goal which all Churches and ecclesial
communities must strive to reach". [64] In fact, "the elements
of this already-given Church exist, joined together in their fullness in
the Catholic Church and, without this fullness, in the other
communities". [65] "Therefore, these separated Churches and
communities as such, though we believe they suffer from defects, have by
no means been deprived of significance and importance in the mystery of
salvation. For the spirit of Christ has not refrained from using them as
means of salvation which derive their efficacy from the very fullness of
grace and truth entrusted to the Catholic Church". [66]
The lack of unity among Christians is certainly a wound for the Church;
not in the sense that she is deprived of her unity, but "in that it
hinders the complete fulfilment of her universality in history". [67]
The Church: Kingdom of God and Kingdom of Christ
18. The mission of the Church is "to proclaim and establish among
all peoples the kingdom of Christ and of God, and she is on earth, the
seed and the beginning of that kingdom". [68] On the one hand, the
Church is "a sacrament — that is, sign and instrument of intimate
union with God and of unity of the entire human race". [69] She is
therefore the sign and instrument of the kingdom; she is called to
announce and to establish the kingdom. On the other hand, the Church is
the "people gathered by the unity of the Father, the Son and the Holy
Spirit"; [70] she is therefore "the kingdom of Christ already
present in mystery" [71] and constitutes its seed and beginning. The
kingdom of God, in fact, has an eschatological dimension: it is a reality
present in time, but its full realization will arrive only with the
completion or fulfilment of history. [72]
The meaning of the expressions kingdom of heaven, kingdom of God, and
kingdom of Christ in Sacred Scripture and the Fathers of the Church, as
well as in the documents of the Magisterium, is not always exactly the
same, nor is their relationship to the Church, which is a mystery that
cannot be totally contained by a human concept. Therefore, there can be
various theological explanations of these terms. However, none of these
possible explanations can deny or empty in any way the intimate connection
between Christ, the kingdom, and the Church. In fact, the kingdom of God
which we know from revelation, "cannot be detached either from Christ
or from the Church ... If the kingdom is separated from Jesus, it is no
longer the kingdom of God which he revealed. The result is a distortion of
the meaning of the kingdom, which runs the risk of being transformed into
a purely human or ideological goal and a distortion of the identity of
Christ, who no longer appears as the Lord to whom everything must one day
be subjected (cf. 1 Cor 15:27). Likewise, one may not separate the kingdom
from the Church. It is true that the Church is not an end unto herself,
since she is ordered toward the kingdom of God, of which she is the seed,
sign and instrument. Yet, while remaining distinct from Christ and the
kingdom, the Church is indissolubly united to both". [73]
19. To state the inseparable relationship between Christ and the
kingdom is not to overlook the fact that the kingdom of God — even if
considered in its historical phase — is not identified with the Church
in her visible and social reality. In fact, "the action of Christ and
the Spirit outside the Church's visible boundaries" must not be
excluded. [74] Therefore, one must also bear in mind that "the
kingdom is the concern of everyone: individuals, society and the world.
Working for the kingdom means acknowledging and promoting God's activity,
which is present in human history and transforms it. Building the kingdom
means working for liberation from evil in all its forms. In a word, the
kingdom of God is the manifestation and the realization of God's plan of
salvation in all its fullness". [75]
In considering the relationship between the kingdom of God, the kingdom
of Christ, and the Church, it is necessary to avoid one-sided
accentuation, as is the case with those "conceptions which
deliberately emphasize the kingdom and which describe themselves as ‘kingdom
centred.' They stress the image of a Church which is not concerned about
herself, but which is totally concerned with bearing witness to and
serving the kingdom. It is a ‘Church for others,' just as Christ is the
‘man for others'... Together with positive aspects, these conceptions
often reveal negative aspects as well. First, they are silent about
Christ: the kingdom of which they speak is ‘theo-centrically' based,
since, according to them, Christ cannot be understood by those who lack
Christian faith, whereas different peoples, cultures, and religions are
capable of finding common ground in the one divine reality, by whatever
name it is called. For the same reason, they put great stress on the
mystery of creation, which is reflected in the diversity of cultures and
beliefs, but they keep silent about the mystery of redemption.
Furthermore, the kingdom, as they understand it, ends up either leaving
very little room for the Church or undervaluing the Church in reaction to
a presumed ‘ecclesiocentrism' of the past and because they consider the
Church herself only a sign, for that matter a sign not without
ambiguity". [76] These theses are contrary to Catholic faith because
they deny the unicity of the relationship which Christ and the Church have
with the kingdom of God.
The Church and Other Religions in Relation to Salvation
20. From what has been stated above, some points follow that are
necessary for theological reflection as it explores the relationship of
the Church and the other religions to salvation.
Above all else, it must be firmly believed that "the Church, a
pilgrim now on earth, is necessary for salvation : the one Christ is
the mediator and the way of salvation; he is present to us in his body
which is the Church. He himself explicitly asserted the necessity of faith
and baptism (cf. Mk 16:16; Jn 3:5), and thereby affirmed at the same time
the necessity of the Church which men enter through baptism as through a
door". [77] This doctrine must not be set against the universal
salvific will of God (cf. 1 Tim 2:4); "it is necessary to keep these
two truths together, namely, the real possibility of salvation in Christ
for all mankind and the necessity of the Church for this salvation".
[78 ]
The Church is the "universal sacrament of salvation", [79]
since, united always in a mysterious way to the Saviour Jesus Christ, her
Head, and subordinated to him, she has, in God's plan, an indispensable
relationship with the salvation of every human being. [80] For those who
are not formally and visibly members of the Church, "salvation in
Christ is accessible by virtue of a grace which, while having a mysterious
relationship to the Church, does not make them formally part of the
Church, but enlightens them in a way which is accommodated to their
spiritual and material situation. This grace comes from Christ; it is the
result of his sacrifice and is communicated by the Holy Spirit"; [81]
it has a relationship with the Church, which "according to the plan
of the Father, has her origin in the mission of the Son and the Holy
Spirit". [82]
21. With respect to the way in which the salvific grace of God —
which is always given by means of Christ in the Spirit and has a
mysterious relationship to the Church — comes to individual
non-Christians, the Second Vatican Council limited itself to the statement
that God bestows it "in ways known to himself". [83] Theologians
are seeking to understand this question more fully. Their work is to be
encouraged, since it is certainly useful for understanding better God's
salvific plan and the ways in which it is accomplished. However, from what
has been stated above about the mediation of Jesus Christ and the
"unique and special relationship" [84] which the Church has with
the kingdom of God among men — which in substance is the universal
kingdom of Christ the Saviour — it is clear that it
would be contrary to the faith to consider the Church as one way of
salvation alongside those constituted by the other religions, seen
as complementary to the Church or substantially equivalent to her, even if
these are said to be converging with the Church toward the eschatological
kingdom of God.
Certainly, the various religious traditions contain and offer religious
elements which come from God, [85] and which are part of what "the
Spirit brings about in human hearts and in the history of peoples, in
cultures, and religions". [86] Indeed, some prayers and rituals of
the other religions may assume a role of preparation for the Gospel, in
that they are occasions or pedagogical helps in which the human heart is
prompted to be open to the action of God. [87] One cannot attribute to
these, however, a divine origin or an ex opere operato salvific
efficacy, which is proper to the Christian sacraments. [88] Furthermore,
it cannot be overlooked that other rituals, insofar as they depend on
superstitions or other errors (cf. 1 Cor 10:20-21), constitute an obstacle
to salvation. [89]
22. With the coming of the Saviour Jesus Christ, God has willed that
the Church founded by him be the instrument for the salvation of all
humanity (cf. Acts 17:30-31). [90] This truth of faith does not lessen the
sincere respect which the Church has for the religions of the world, but
at the same time, it rules out, in a radical way, that mentality of
indifferentism "characterized by a religious relativism which leads
to the belief that ‘one religion is as good as another'". [91] If
it is true that the followers of other religions can receive divine grace,
it is also certain that objectively speaking they
are in a gravely deficient situation in comparison with those who, in the
Church, have the fullness of the means of salvation. [92] However,
"all the children of the Church should nevertheless remember that
their exalted condition results, not from their own merits, but from the
grace of Christ. If they fail to respond in thought, word, and deed to
that grace, not only shall they not be saved, but they shall be more
severely judged". [93] One understands then that, following the
Lord's command (cf. Mt 28:19-20) and as a requirement of her love for all
people, the Church "proclaims and is in duty bound to proclaim
without fail, Christ who is the way, the truth, and the life (Jn 14:6). In
him, in whom God reconciled all things to himself (cf. 2 Cor 5:18-19), men
find the fullness of their religious life". [94]
In inter-religious dialogue as well, the mission ad gentes
"today as always retains its full force and necessity". [95]
"Indeed, God ‘desires all men to be saved and come to the knowledge
of the truth' (1 Tim 2:4); that is, God wills the salvation of everyone
through the knowledge of the truth. Salvation is found in the truth. Those
who obey the promptings of the Spirit of truth are already on the way of
salvation. But the Church, to whom this truth has been entrusted, must go
out to meet their desire, so as to bring them the truth. Because she
believes in God's universal plan of salvation, the
Church must be missionary". [96] Inter-religious dialogue,
therefore, as part of her evangelizing mission, is just one of the actions
of the Church in her mission ad gentes. [97] Equality, which is a
presupposition of inter-religious dialogue, refers to the equal personal
dignity of the parties in dialogue, not to doctrinal content, nor even
less to the position of Jesus Christ — who is God himself made man —
in relation to the founders of the other religions. Indeed, the Church,
guided by charity and respect for freedom, [98] must be primarily
committed to proclaiming to all people the truth definitively revealed by
the Lord, and to announcing the necessity of conversion to Jesus Christ
and of adherence to the Church through Baptism and the other sacraments,
in order to participate fully in communion with God, the Father, Son and
Holy Spirit. Thus, the certainty of the universal salvific will of God
does not diminish, but rather increases the duty and urgency of the
proclamation of salvation and of conversion to the Lord Jesus Christ.
Conclusion
23. The intention of the present Declaration, in reiterating and
clarifying certain truths of the faith, has been to follow the example of
the Apostle Paul, who wrote to the faithful of Corinth: "I handed on
to you as of first importance what I myself received" (1 Cor 15:3).
Faced with certain problematic and even erroneous propositions,
theological reflection is called to reconfirm the Church's faith and to
give reasons for her hope in a way that is convincing and effective.
In treating the question of the true religion, the Fathers of the
Second Vatican Council taught: "We believe that this one true
religion continues to exist in the Catholic and Apostolic Church, to which
the Lord Jesus entrusted the task of spreading it among all people. Thus,
he said to the Apostles: ‘Go therefore and make disciples of all nations
baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy
Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you' (Mt 28:
19-20). Especially in those things that concern God and his Church, all
persons are required to seek the truth, and when they come to know it, to
embrace it and hold fast to it". [99]
The revelation of Christ will continue to be "the true
lodestar" [100] in history for all humanity: "The truth, which
is Christ, imposes itself as an all-embracing authority". [101] The
Christian mystery, in fact, overcomes all barriers of time and space, and
accomplishes the unity of the human family: "From their different
locations and traditions all are called in Christ to share in the unity of
the family of God's children... Jesus destroys the walls of division and
creates unity in a new and unsurpassed way through our sharing in his
mystery. This unity is so deep that the Church can say with Saint Paul:
‘You are no longer strangers and sojourners, but you are saints and
members of the household of God' (Eph 2:19)". [102]
The Sovereign Pontiff John Paul II, at the Audience of June 16, 2000,
granted to the undersigned Cardinal Prefect of the Congregation for the
Doctrine of the Faith, with sure knowledge and by his apostolic authority,
ratified and confirmed this Declaration, adopted in Plenary Session and
ordered its publication.
Rome, from the Offices of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the
Faith, August 6, 2000, the Feast of the Transfiguration of the Lord.
Joseph Card. Ratzinger
Prefect
Tarcisio Bertone, S.D.B.
Archbishop Emeritus of Vercelli
Secretary
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) First Council of Constantinople, Symbolum Constantinopolitanum: DS
150.
(2) Cf. John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Redemptoris missio, 1: AAS 83
(1991), 249-340.
(3) Cf. Second Vatican Council, Decree Ad gentes and Declaration Nostra
aetate; cf. also Paul VI Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii nuntiandi: AAS 68
(1976), 5-76; John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Redemptoris missio.
(4) Second Vatican Council, Declaration Nostra aetate, 2.
(5) Pontifical Council for Inter-religious Dialogue and the
Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples, Instruction Dialogue and
Proclamation, 29: AAS 84 (1992), 424; cf. Second Vatican Council, Pastoral
Constitution Gaudium et spes, 22.
(6) Cf. John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Redemptoris missio, 55: AAS 83
(1991), 302-304.
(7) Cf. Pontifical Council for Inter-religious Dialogue and the
Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples, Instruction Dialogue and
Proclamation, 9: AAS 84 (1992), 417ff.
(8) John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Fides et ratio, 5: AAS 91 (1999),
5-88.
(9) Second Vatican Council, Dogmatic Constitution Dei verbum, 2.
(10) Ibid., 4.
(11) John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Redemptoris missio, 5.
(12) John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Fides et ratio, 14.
(13) Council of Chalcedon, Symbolum Chalcedonense: DS 301; cf. St.
Athanasius, De Incarnatione, 54, 3: SC 199, 458.
(14) Second Vatican Council, Dogmatic Constitution Dei verbum, 4.
(15) Ibid., 5.
(16) Ibid.
(17) Cf. Catechism of the Catholic Church, 144.
(18) Ibid., 150.
(19) Ibid., 153.
(20) Ibid., 178.
(21) John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Fides et ratio, 13.
(22) Cf. ibid., 31-32.
(23) Second Vatican Council, Declaration Nostra aetate, 2; cf. Second
Vatican Council, Decree Ad gentes, 9, where it speaks of the elements of
good present "in the particular customs and cultures of
peoples"; Dogmatic Constitution Lumen gentium, 16, where it mentions
the elements of good and of truth present among non-Christians, which can
be considered a preparation for the reception of the Gospel.
(24) Cf. Council of Trent, Decretum de libris sacris et de
traditionibus recipiendis: DS 1501; First Vatican Council, Dogmatic
Constitution Dei Filius, cap. 2: DS 3006.
(25) Second Vatican Council, Dogmatic Constitution Dei verbum, 11.
(26) Ibid.
(27) John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Redemptoris missio, 55; cf. 56 and
Paul VI, Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii nuntiandi, 53.
(28) First Council of Nicaea, Symbolum Nicaenum: DS 125.
(29) Council of Chalcedon, Symbolum Chalcedonense: DS 301.
(30) Second Vatican Council, Pastoral Constitution Gaudium et spes, 22.
(31) John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Redemptoris missio, 6.
(32) Cf. St. Leo the Great, Tomus ad Flavianum: DS 294.
(33) Cf. St. Leo the Great, Letter to the Emperor Leo I Promisisse me
memini: DS 318: "...in tantam unitatem ab ipso conceptu Virginis
deitate et humanitate conserta, ut nec sine homine divina, nec sine Deo
agerentur humana". Cf. also ibid. DS 317.
(34) Second Vatican Council, Pastoral Constitution Gaudium et spes, 45;
cf. also Council of Trent, Decretum de peccato originali, 3: DS 1513.
(35) Cf. Second Vatican Council, Dogmatic Constitution Lumen gentium,
3-4.
(36) Cf. ibid., 7; cf. St. Irenaeus, who wrote that it is in the Church
"that communion with Christ has been deposited, that is to say: the
Holy Spirit" (Adversus haereses III, 24, 1: SC 211, 472).
(37) Second Vatican Council, Pastoral Constitution Gaudium et spes, 22.
(38) John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Redemptoris missio, 28. For the
"seeds of the Word" cf. also St. Justin Martyr, Second Apology
8, 1-2; 10, 1-3; 13, 3-6: ed. E.J. Goodspeed, 84; 85; 88-89.
(39) Cf. John Paul II, Encyclical Letter, Redemptoris missio, 28-29.
(40) Ibid., 29.
(41) Ibid., 5.
(42) Second Vatican Council, Pastoral Constitution Gaudium et spes, 10.
Cf. St. Augustine, who wrote that Christ is the way, which "has never
been lacking to mankind... and apart from this way no one has been set
free, no one is being set free, no one will be set free" De civitate
Dei 10, 32, 2: CCSL 47, 312.
(43) Second Vatican Council, Dogmatic Constitution Lumen gentium, 62.
(44) John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Redemptoris missio, 5.
(45) Second Vatican Council, Pastoral Constitution Gaudium et spes, 45.
The necessary and absolute singularity of Christ in human history is well
expressed by St. Irenaeus in contemplating the preeminence of Jesus as
firstborn Son: "In the heavens, as firstborn of the Father's counsel,
the perfect Word governs and legislates all things; on the earth, as
firstborn of the Virgin, a man just and holy, reverencing God and pleasing
to God, good and perfect in every way, he saves from hell all those who
follow him since he is the firstborn from the dead and Author of the life
of God" (Demonstratio apostolica, 39: SC 406, 138).
(46) John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Redemptoris missio, 6.
(47) Cf. Second Vatican Council, Dogmatic Constitution Lumen gentium,
14.
(48) Cf. ibid., 7.
(49) Cf. St. Augustine, Enarratio in Psalmos, Ps. 90, Sermo 2,1: CCSL
39, 1266; St. Gregory the Great, Moralia in Iob, Praefatio, 6, 14: PL 75,
525; St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, III, q. 48, a. 2 ad 1.
(50) Cf. Second Vatican Council, Dogmatic Constitution Lumen gentium,
6.
(51) Symbolum maius Ecclesiae Armeniacae: DS 48. Cf. Boniface VIII,
Unam sanctam: DS 870-872; Second Vatican Council, Dogmatic Constitution
Lumen gentium, 8.
(52) Cf. Second Vatican Council, Decree Unitatis redintegratio, 4; John
Paul II, Encyclical Letter Ut unum sint, 11: AAS 87 (1995), 927.
(53) Cf. Second Vatican Council, Dogmatic Constitution Lumen gentium,
20; cf. also St. Irenaeus, Adversus haereses, III, 3, 1-3: SC 211, 20-44;
St. Cyprian, Epist. 33, 1: CCSL 3B, 164-165; St. Augustine, Contra adver.
legis et prophet., 1, 20, 39: CCSL 49, 70.
(54) Second Vatican Council, Dogmatic Constitution Lumen gentium, 8.
(55) Ibid.; cf. John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Ut unum sint, 13. Cf.
also Second Vatican Council, Dogmatic Constitution Lumen gentium, 15 and
the Decree Unitatis redintegratio, 3.
(56) The interpretation of those who would derive from the formula
subsistit in the thesis that the one Church of Christ could subsist also
in non-Catholic Churches and ecclesial communities is therefore contrary
to the authentic meaning of Lumen gentium. "The Council instead chose
the word subsistit precisely to clarify that there exists only one ‘subsistence'
of the true Church, while outside her visible structure there only exist
elementa Ecclesiae, which — being elements of that same Church — tend
and lead toward the Catholic Church" (Congregation for the Doctrine
of the Faith, Notification on the Book "Church: Charism and
Power" by Father Leonardo Boff: AAS 77 [1985], 756-762).
(57) Second Vatican Council, Decree Unitatis redintegratio, 3.
(58) Cf. Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Declaration
Mysterium Ecclesiae, 1: AAS 65 (1973), 396-398.
(59) Cf. Second Vatican Council, Decree Unitatis redintegratio, 14 and
15; Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Letter Communionis notio,
17: AAS 85 (1993), 848.
(60) Cf. First Vatican Council, Constitution Pastor aeternus: DS
3053-3064; Second Vatican Council, Dogmatic Constitution Lumen gentium,
22.
(61) Cf. Second Vatican Council, Decree Unitatis redintegratio, 22.
(62) Cf. ibid., 3.
(63) Cf. ibid., 22.
(64) Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Declaration Mysterium
Ecclesiae, 1.
(65) John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Ut unum sint, 14.
(66) Second Vatican Council, Decree Unitatis redintegratio, 3.
(67) Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Letter Communionis
notio, 17; cf. Second Vatican Council, Decree Unitatis redintegratio, 4.
(68) Second Vatican Council, Dogmatic Constitution Lumen gentium, 5.
(69) Ibid., 1.
(70) Ibid., 4. Cf. St. Cyprian, De Dominica oratione 23: CCSL 3A, 105.
(71) Second Vatican Council, Dogmatic Constitution Lumen gentium, 3.
(72) Cf. ibid., 9; cf. also the prayer addressed to God found in the
Didache 9,4: SC 248, 176: "May the Church be gathered from the ends
of the earth into your kingdom" and ibid. 10, 5: SC 248, 180:
"Remember, Lord, your Church... and, made holy, gather her together
from the four winds into your kingdom which you have prepared for
her".
(73) John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Redemptoris missio, 18; cf.
Apostolic Exhortation Ecclesia in Asia, 17: L'Osservatore Romano (November
7, 1999). The kingdom is so inseparable from Christ that, in a certain
sense, it is identified with him (cf. Origen, In Mt. Hom., 14, 7: PG 13,
1197; Tertullian, Adversus Marcionem, IV, 33,8: CCSL 1, 634.
(74) John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Redemptoris missio, 18.
(75) Ibid., 15.
(76) Ibid., 17.
(77) Second Vatican Council, Dogmatic Constitution Lumen gentium, 14;
cf. Decree Ad gentes, 7; Decree Unitatis redintegratio, 3.
(78) John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Redemptoris missio, 9; cf.
Catechism of the Catholic Church, 846-847.
(79) Second Vatican Council, Dogmatic Constitution Lumen gentium, 48.
(80) Cf. St. Cyprian, De catholicae ecclesiae unitate, 6: CCSL 3,
253-254; St. Irenaeus, Adversus haereses, III, 24, 1: SC 211, 472-474.
(81) John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Redemptoris missio, 10.
(82) Second Vatican Council, Decree Ad gentes, 2. The famous formula
extra Ecclesiam nullus omnino salvatur is to be interpreted in this sense
(cf. Fourth Lateran Council, Cap. 1. De fide catholica: DS 802). Cf. also
the Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston: DS 3866-3872.
(83) Second Vatican Council, Decree Ad gentes, 7.
(84) John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Redemptoris missio, 18.
(85) These are the seeds of the divine Word (semina Verbi), which the
Church recognizes with joy and respect (cf. Second Vatican Council, Decree
Ad gentes, 11; Declaration Nostra aetate, 2).
(86) John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Redemptoris missio, 29.
(87) Cf. ibid.; Catechism of the Catholic Church, 843.
(88) Cf. Council of Trent, Decretum de sacramentis, can. 8, de
sacramentis in genere: DS 1608.
(89) Cf. John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Redemptoris missio, 55.
(90) Cf. Second Vatican Council, Dogmatic Constitution Lumen gentium,
17; John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Redemptoris missio, 11.
(91) John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Redemptoris missio, 36.
(92) Cf. Pius XII, Encyclical Letter Mystici corporis: DS 3821.
(93) Second Vatican Council, Dogmatic Constitution Lumen gentium, 14.
(94) Second Vatican Council, Declaration Nostra aetate, 2.
(95) Second Vatican Council, Decree Ad gentes, 7.
(96) Catechism of the Catholic Church, 851; cf. also 849-856.
(97) Cf. John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Redemptoris missio, 55;
Apostolic Exhortation Ecclesia in Asia, 31.
(98) Cf. Second Vatican Council, Declaration Dignitatis humanae, 1.
(99) Ibid.
(100) John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Fides et ratio, 15.
(101) Ibid., 92.
(102) Ibid., 70.
[Home] [Back] |